Larkin and Lacey Independent Journalists Who Didnt Compromise Truth Against All Odds

Most of the well-educated people who are in the know of what is happening in the world are well aware of the fact that the media houses across the globe cannot be trusted on their face value. Learn more about Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey: http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/lacey-larkin-speak-out-on-trump-pardon-of-arpaio-9879938 and http://www.laceyandlarkinfronterafund.org/about-lacey-larkin-frontera-fund/relevant-links/

No matter how big or old the media house maybe, everyone is biased at some levels and may even be manipulative in their news reporting. It is what is causing more and more people to source the information and news from the local independently published newspapers.

Many alternative media houses are becoming big these days and are gaining popularity across the United States. One such media house is Village Voice Media, which is co-owned by Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey. They started their career in the field of journalism while they were still in the college during the early 1970s.

It is during this time they published the weekly named Phoenix New Times, which was primarily focused on rubbishing the false news offered by the mainstream media on the anti-war student protests.

Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey proved to the perfect team as Larkin was more into handling the business and the advertising aspect of the news business they started while Lacey served as the executive editor.

One of the reasons behind the massive success they enjoy today as the owners of Village Voice Media is that they have never allowed outside influence to affect their reporting negatively. Read more: Michael Lacey | Twitter and Jim Larkin | Twitter

There are many harmful elements out there who continually try to manipulate the news for their benefits and to keep the public in the dark, but Larkin and Lacey believe it is their duty as the reporters and responsible citizens to bring the facts and the real news in front of the public.

It is this habit of Larkin and Lacey to never compromise on truth is what led them to spend 24 days in prison, when Maricopa County Sherriff ordered their arrest wrongfully. Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey were arrested from their house at the late hours of the night from their houses.

The arrest was made due to them reporting the details of the grand jury probe in the Phoenix New Times. It is the direct breach of the United States Constitution that allows the media to be free of any outside pressure.

Larkin and Lacey kept their calm during the entire process even when they were being harassed without any proper rhyme or reason. It was the personal vendetta that Joe Arpaio was pursuing as he was upset with the report in Phoenix New Times on grand jury investigations and the subpoena the authority issued for the writer, readers, and the editor.

Larkin and Lacey filed the case against the state and the sheriff as soon as they were released, a claim that they eventually won. Along with winning the case, they were granted a compensation amount of $3.7 million. The compensation amount was transformed to Frontera Fund, which is now used to provide legal and financial aid to people in need in the Hispanic and other minority communities.

Why IC System is the Industry Leader Among Collection Agencies

Where several collection agencies fail in terms of offering quality service and maintaining close relationships with the clients, one agency, IC System straddles the gap and leads the pack. They have a strong commitment to providing exclusive and incredible services to the customer. The company has a long history of existence and has grown to become a renown accounts receivable company.

 

IC System was established in 1938 by Ruth and Jack Erickson. It has its headquarters in St. Paul Minnesota. Since its inception, the company amidst management transitions remain focused and dedicated to its credibility in the service offering. This commitment has seen the company become a finalist for the Better Business Bureau’s Torch Award for Ethics three years consecutively starting 2013.

 

Apart from its efforts and innovative transformations, IC System has a strong presence across the world for its efforts in corporate social initiatives. It spearheads annual campaigns that donate services, monetary aid, time, and resources to name a few. The employees engage in a plethora of volunteer work and have made notable contributions to initiatives like Toys for Tots, The American Red Cross, and The Special Olympics.

 

As part of its corporate social responsibility, IC Systems advocates for the utilization of sustainable practices. The goals have so far been achieved through a variety of fashions including effective communication with partners, operational methods, and the scrutiny of the strengths and weaknesses. Emphasis on the reduction of carbon and the use of renewable energy sources are some of the sustainable goals the company focuses on.

 

IC System maintains a strong Compliance Risk Management System that is up to par with the industry standards. It has a rigorous training and thorough documentation as well as an inclusive auditing system that allows them to ensure that its employees are fit for the job.

 

The firm can efficiently collect debts anywhere in the U.S and Puerto Rico and Guam. It is licensed or bonded in all 50 states. The licensing is core to IC System’s mission, which enables them to reach individuals with balances who are living far from their areas of service. Their nationwide reach also gives the company an advantage. They can offer collection services without relying on the location of the customers.

 

The licensing, the core values, the charitable work and the efficiency with which IC System is run portrays an impeccable example of how a collection agency can become industry leaders.

learn more about ic system in following link

https://www.dailyforexreport.com/ic-system/

Kamil Idris Offers His Valued Insight On the State of International Intellectual Property Law

Kamil Idris recently spoke on the record about the difficulties that can arise regarding intellectual property in a global market. He offers some very interesting and valuable insight into the question of what steps are being taken to deal with these difficulties. Kamil Idris explains that piracy, as well as counterfeiting along with backlog issues, are often associated with intellectual property violations in the case of applying for patents. To create better enforceability of patent law across the world, Kamil suggests the TRIPS Agreement is a great start as it calls for a very high standard which must be agreed upon mutually between parties contracting business. In the case of activities that companies can consider doing to solve any intellectual property disputes quickly, Kamil feels that companies with international operations must always be cautious in regard to protecting their intellectual property. Companies should always be pro-active.

 

Kamil Idris is of the opinion that the United States acts in very strong accordance with high legal standards on the protection of intellectual property and has always been very compliant with WIPO. When asked what legal jurisdictions have the best systems in place for the protection of intellectual property, Kamil states that there is no easy answer to a question as complex as this and that doing a simple ranking of nations would minimize the complexity of the matter. Kamil’s thoughts on patent trolls in relation to the U.S. is that the PCT is a very thorough system and is always being improved. He also talks from the WIPO perspective about multilateral treaties. Kamil states that WIPO has a commitment toward multilateralism. WIPO is an intergovernmental outfit and serves as a meeting place for its members to voice their opinions. It contains 184 nations and is committed to the protection of intellectual property.

 

About Professor Kamil Idris:

Kamil Idris is an international civil servant who holds a PhD in the field of international law from Switzerland’s Geneva University. He is currently President of the International Court of Arbitration and Mediation and formerly served in the role as Director General for the intellectual property protection organization the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).